![tumblr interracial gay videos tumblr interracial gay videos](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/a0/53/05/a0530557b4f5af62d3c9c4eec6e0a5d7--lesbian-pride-lesbian-couples.jpg)
“In the past the judicial system would have protected these rights, but that’s not the case in this draft,” she explained. Privacy, Warbelow said, is one of those rights. “The idea is that these rights are so entrenched in American society, it would be unreasonable for laws to be written that would take them away.” “The 14th Amendment has been interpreted over the years to protect fundamental rights - known as substantive due process rights,” she said. Sarah Warbelow, legal director for the Human Rights Campaign, a Washington-based LGBTQ advocacy group, said that is a concern Americans need to take seriously. Jameson and others worry that, if Roe is overturned, their right to contraceptives could also be in danger, as could a number of other rights. Griswold used that right to determine the Constitution protects the liberty of married couples to buy and use contraceptives without government interference. Wade, the court explained the right to privacy was acknowledged in previous cases, such as Griswold v. In 1973, for example, when deciding Roe v. “Gay marriage, interracial marriage - the Supreme Court works on precedent, so every decision is built from a previous one.” “I’m afraid that any right tied to a right to privacy could be taken away if Roe is overturned,” Morgan Jameson, an English-Spanish language interpreter in Portland, Oregon, told VOA. The right to privacy as a general concept has served as the underpinning for a multitude of specific rights many Americans have come to take for granted in modern-day life. “They’re trying to use scare tactics to protect abortion, but it won’t work.” “It’s just another example of liberals using fear to create doubt and try to get what they want,” said Cathy Pridgen, a grandmother in Rocky Mount, North Carolina. They point to Alito’s own words in the leaked draft, where he wrote, “Nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.” While many Americans share Robb’s fears, there are others who believe those fears are exaggerated or misguided. I’m scared LGTBQ+ rights will be stripped, that marriage and segregation laws for people of color will be revisited, and that immigrants will be treated unfairly by the courts.”
![tumblr interracial gay videos tumblr interracial gay videos](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/e0/71/8d/e0718dc307f9f7215b00302761923d7f.jpg)
![tumblr interracial gay videos tumblr interracial gay videos](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/73/6a/6d/736a6d7b81336f4bb42336aee7fbe666.jpg)
![tumblr interracial gay videos tumblr interracial gay videos](https://64.media.tumblr.com/ff67090e83dfe7e237911466f199a6b6/tumblr_o1kftiO6Ln1s9bxreo1_400.jpg)
“I’m concerned that our right to contraception will be threatened,” she said, “and that marriage equality will be next. “If Alito is saying that Americans don’t have an inherent right to privacy, then it opens the door to every bedroom in the country,” Rebecca Robb, a Boulder, Colorado, beauty shop worker, told VOA. Alito’s draft ruling attacks that reasoning. Wade and multiple subsequent decisions: that Americans have a right to privacy that is implied but not stated in the U.S. Many of those rights arise from a fundamental principle the court set forth in Roe v. Many worry the reasoning used by Alito could be applied to overturn other rights the Supreme Court has affirmed as constitutionally protected. While cheered by social conservatives, the draft opinion has caused panic in other sectors, and not only because it would scuttle a nearly 50-year nationwide right to abortion. Several states have so-called “trigger laws” in place to ban abortions the moment the high court issues such a ruling, and several other states are expected to follow suit if a federal guarantee of abortion rights is rescinded. Wade decision, a move that would allow individual states to outlaw abortion. Supreme Court Associate Justice Samuel Alito was leaked to the public indicating the court was poised to overturn its landmark 1973 Roe v. Earlier this month, a draft majority opinion by U.S.